Stumphauzer O’Toole has provided a variety of services for public school districts, including labor and employment issues, grievances, arbitrations, SERB and unfair labor practice matters, employee and student disciplinary matters and collective bargaining negotiations. The firm has also represented public school clients with matters pertaining to Ohio Sunshine Law, Public Records Act, Open Meetings Act, Public Record Retention and privacy matters. Whatever your public school law needs are Stumphauzer O’Toole and its talented, experienced staff of attorneys can help produce real results.
Employment, Insurance, Labor, Litigation, Personal Injury, Public School, Public Sector
Partner, Co-Head, Litigation Dept. His areas of concentration are litigation, political subdivisions, personal injury, and school defense.
Read Complete Bio »
Business, Employment, Labor, Municipal, Public School, Public Sector
Kenneth's practice areas include business law, public sector law, civil litigation, and business and corporate succession planning.
Read Complete Bio »
Employment, Insurance, Litigation, Personal Injury, Public School
Kim has extensive experience in civil litigation, which includes jury trials, arbitration, mediation and Appellate litigation. He has concentrated his practice in the areas of insurance law, school law, municipal law, employment law, personal injury, wrongful death, business law, public record law and probate law.
Read Complete Bio »
Labor, Litigation, Municipal, Public School, Public Sector
In his first four years of practice as an Ohio Assistant Attorney General, he helped to establish Ohio's first Medicaid Fraud Unit. For the past 30 years Michael has been primarily practicing in the areas of labor, school, and municipal law.
Read Complete Bio »
A consortium of rural water industry leaders recently formed The Rural Water Alliance with the primary objective of helping rural water association general managers and board members protect their interests and maximize their effectiveness.
Ross County filed a motion for summary judgment, which has been countered by Chillicothe's brief in opposition, and followed by Ross’s reply (see filings).